RIGHT VOTER, LLC
RIGHT VOTER, LLC is a digital vendor. In the 2025-2026 cycle RIGHT VOTER, LLC was paid $4.29M across 28 client committees, of which $320K flowed through Independent Expenditures rather than direct committee payments.
Part I Identity
Stable facts about this entity. These figures do not change as you adjust the timeframe in Part II.
Source split
| Schedule B direct committee payments |
$3,965,457 | 364 rows | 92.5% |
| Independent Expenditures money this entity spent supporting candidates, NOT a committee paying them |
$319,747 | 13 rows | 7.5% |
- Activity span ALL TIME
- Jul 30, 2016 → Jul 14, 2021
- spans 5.0 years
- Disbursements ALL TIME
- 364
- Schedule B + IE rows
- Client committees ALL TIME
- 28
- distinct payers
Part II Activity in selected window
One timeframe control governs all three panels below. Change it once and the trajectory, top buyers, and party breakdown all update together.
Spend trajectory
Monthly spend to this vendor over the last 12 months.
Top buyers
Two views of the same data — diagram and table share the time-window control and the same top-buyers slice. Click "View all buyers in research" to drill in with the matching date range.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
By party
Revenue by party
| Party | Amount | % |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic | $0 | 0.00% |
| Republican | $3,418,496 | 79.77% |
| Non-partisan | $866,708 | 20.23% |
Part III Reference tables
Full all-time and cycle-to-date data.
Cycle-over-cycle trajectory
current cycle earlier election cycle off-cycle year quarterly · 5 years
| Year | Q | Cycle | Total | Txns | Top buyer · share | Top category · share | Cum. (cycle) | YoY % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Q3 | 2018 | $97K | 5 | GIBBONS FOR OHIO 100% | Digital 100% | $97K | — |
| 2017 | Q4 | 2018 | $78K | 10 | GIBBONS FOR OHIO 90% | Digital 100% | $175K | — |
| 2018 | Q1 | 2018 | $211K | 19 | GIBBONS FOR OHIO 52% | Digital 100% | $386K | — |
| 2018 | Q2 | 2018 | $438K | 31 | CITIZENS FOR A STRONG AMERI… 47% | Digital 100% | $824K | — |
| 2018 | Q3 | 2018 | $18K | 6 | CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS … 42% | Digital 100% | $842K | — |
| 2018 | Q4 | 2018 | $256K | 24 | TUCK FOR SUPERINTENDENT OF … 34% | Digital 100% | $1.1M | — |
| 2019 | Q1 | 2020 | $4K | 3 | TAYLOR FOR CONGRESS 58% | Digital 100% | $4K | — |
| 2019 | Q2 | 2020 | $24K | 4 | OHIO STRONG ACTION 81% | Digital 100% | $28K | — |
| 2019 | Q3 | 2020 | $54K | 12 | OHIO STRONG ACTION 61% | Digital 100% | $82K | -44% |
| 2019 | Q4 | 2020 | $114K | 30 | FRIENDS OF KELLY MITCHELL 27% | Digital 100% | $196K | +46% |
| 2020 | Q1 | 2020 | $126K | 37 | OHIO STRONG ACTION 32% | Digital 100% | $322K | -40% |
| 2020 | Q2 | 2020 | $183K | 44 | MESSNER FOR SENATE 24% | Digital 100% | $505K | -58% |
| 2020 | Q3 | 2020 | $736K | 69 | LACY JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS 50% | Digital 100% | $1.24M | +3920% |
| 2020 | Q4 | 2020 | $1.46M | 56 | LACY JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS 66% | Digital 100% | $2.7M | +469% |
| 2021 | Q1 | 2022 | $50K | 11 | OHIO STRONG ACTION 99% | Digital 100% | $50K | +1074% |
| 2021 | Q2 | 2022 | $50K | 1 | CAMMACK, KAT 100% | Digital 100% | $100K | +112% |
| 2021 | Q3 | 2022 | $69K | 2 | CAMMACK, KAT 96% | Digital 100% | $170K | +28% |
Revenue by service category
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
| Category | Total spend | Txns | Avg check | % of total | Top buyer · share | Last paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital | $3,965,457 | 364 | $11K | 100.0% | LACY JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS 34% | 5y ago |
Client retention
Sticky-relationship signal: how many clients keep coming back across cycles vs one-time buyers.
Geographic concentration
Where this vendor's clients are based — federal committees by state, plus implicit jurisdiction for CA and TX state filers.
| State | Total spend | % of revenue | Clients | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WI | $1,674,137 | 42.7% | 2 | |
| OH | $657,963 | 16.8% | 2 | |
| FL | $317,691 | 8.1% | 1 | |
| NC | $291,816 | 7.4% | 1 | |
| MA | $286,651 | 7.3% | 1 | |
| CA | $258,653 | 6.6% | 4 | |
| NH | $194,295 | 5.0% | 3 | |
| SC | $88,902 | 2.3% | 2 | |
| IN | $67,171 | 1.7% | 1 | |
| IA | $45,839 | 1.2% | 1 | |
| WV | $17,730 | 0.5% | 2 | |
| NV | $16,729 | 0.4% | 1 |
Notable disbursements
5 largest all-time · 5 largest in the current cycle · 5 most recent. Each row earns its place.
| Reason | Date | Filer | Category | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Largest all-time | 2020-09-30 | LACY JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS | Digital | DIGITAL CONSULTING | $153,703 |
| Largest all-time | 2020-10-01 | LACY JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS | Digital | DIRECT MAIL | $140,728 |
| Largest all-time | 2020-10-20 | LACY JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS | Digital | DIRECT MAIL | $132,914 |
| Largest all-time | 2020-10-12 | LACY JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS | Digital | DIRECT MAIL | $101,422 |
| Largest all-time | 2020-10-23 | LACY JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS | Digital | DIGITAL ADVERTISING | $100,000 |
| Largest this cycle | 2021-07-14 | CAMMACK, KAT | Digital | STRATEGY CONSULTING | $66,376 |
| Largest this cycle | 2021-04-15 | CAMMACK, KAT | Digital | STRATEGY CONSULTING | $50,000 |
| Largest this cycle | 2021-01-25 | OHIO STRONG ACTION | Digital | STRATEGY CONSULTING | $20,000 |
| Largest this cycle | 2021-02-02 | OHIO STRONG ACTION | Digital | STRATEGY CONSULTING | $10,000 |
| Largest this cycle | 2021-03-05 | OHIO STRONG ACTION | Digital | STRATEGY CONSULTING | $10,000 |
| Recent | 2021-07-12 | DR. GINA SMITH FOR CONGRESS | Digital | STRATEGY CONSULTING | $2,693 |
| Recent | 2021-03-05 | OHIO STRONG ACTION | Digital | DIGITAL CONSULTING | $2,000 |