PROSPER GROUP
PROSPER GROUP is a digital vendor. In the 2025-2026 cycle PROSPER GROUP was paid $1.15M across 23 client committees, of which $750 flowed through Independent Expenditures rather than direct committee payments.
Part I Identity
Stable facts about this entity. These figures do not change as you adjust the timeframe in Part II.
Source split
| Schedule B direct committee payments |
$1,147,260 | 144 rows | 99.9% |
| Independent Expenditures money this entity spent supporting candidates, NOT a committee paying them |
$750 | 1 rows | 0.1% |
- Activity span ALL TIME
- Jun 4, 2013 → Apr 9, 2024
- spans 10.8 years
- Disbursements ALL TIME
- 144
- Schedule B + IE rows
- Client committees ALL TIME
- 23
- distinct payers
Part II Activity in selected window
One timeframe control governs all three panels below. Change it once and the trajectory, top buyers, and party breakdown all update together.
Spend trajectory
Monthly spend to this vendor over the last 12 months.
Top buyers
Two views of the same data — diagram and table share the time-window control and the same top-buyers slice. Click "View all buyers in research" to drill in with the matching date range.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
No buyer activity in this window.
By party
Revenue by party
| Party | Amount | % |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic | $0 | 0.00% |
| Republican | $570,845 | 49.72% |
| Non-partisan | $577,165 | 50.28% |
Part III Reference tables
Full all-time and cycle-to-date data.
Cycle-over-cycle trajectory
current cycle earlier election cycle off-cycle year quarterly · 8 years
| Year | Q | Cycle | Total | Txns | Top buyer · share | Top category · share | Cum. (cycle) | YoY % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Q4 | 2016 | $28K | 4 | CLARDY TRAVIS P HONORABLE 100% | Digital 100% | $28K | — |
| 2017 | Q4 | 2018 | $1K | 2 | CRIDER FOR CONGRESS, INC 100% | Digital 100% | $1K | — |
| 2018 | Q1 | 2018 | $15K | 4 | CLARDY TRAVIS P HONORABLE 78% | Digital 100% | $16K | — |
| 2018 | Q2 | 2018 | $8K | 3 | LEVENSON FOR CONGRESS 100% | Digital 100% | $24K | — |
| 2018 | Q3 | 2018 | $14K | 2 | NRSC 74% | Digital 100% | $37K | — |
| 2019 | Q3 | 2020 | $17K | 3 | CARTER, EARL LEROY 100% | Digital 100% | $17K | — |
| 2019 | Q4 | 2020 | $14K | 1 | SETHI, DR. MANNY 100% | Digital 100% | $31K | +935% |
| 2020 | Q1 | 2020 | $81K | 4 | TOM REED PAC 81% | Digital 100% | $112K | +436% |
| 2020 | Q2 | 2020 | $20K | 3 | TOM REED PAC 77% | Digital 100% | $131K | +163% |
| 2020 | Q3 | 2020 | $144K | 7 | TOM REED PAC 87% | Digital 100% | $275K | +963% |
| 2020 | Q4 | 2020 | $97K | 6 | TOM REED PAC 83% | Digital 100% | $372K | — |
| 2021 | Q1 | 2020 | $5K | 2 | FONG FOR ASSEMBLY 2020; VIN… 99% | Digital 100% | $377K | — |
| 2021 | Q1 | 2022 | $30K | 4 | TOM REED PAC 95% | Digital 100% | $30K | — |
| 2021 | Q2 | 2020 | $10K | 5 | FONG FOR ASSEMBLY 2020; VIN… 92% | Digital 100% | $386K | — |
| 2021 | Q2 | 2022 | $18K | 6 | TOM REED PAC 68% | Digital 100% | $48K | — |
| 2021 | Q3 | 2020 | $19K | 4 | FONG FOR ASSEMBLY 2020; VIN… 46% | Digital 100% | $405K | — |
| 2021 | Q3 | 2022 | $7K | 5 | LUCAS, FRANK D. 78% | Digital 100% | $55K | -60% |
| 2021 | Q4 | 2020 | $14K | 6 | FONG FOR ASSEMBLY 2022; VIN… 100% | Digital 100% | $419K | — |
| 2021 | Q4 | 2022 | $10K | 5 | LUCAS, FRANK D. 54% | Digital 100% | $65K | -27% |
| 2022 | Q1 | 2022 | $29K | 15 | DEBORAH FLORA FOR COLORADO 52% | Digital 100% | $94K | -65% |
| 2022 | Q2 | 2022 | $31K | 9 | DEBORAH FLORA FOR COLORADO 58% | Digital 100% | $124K | +55% |
| 2022 | Q3 | 2022 | $38K | 6 | ZUBELDIA DEREK LEE MR 79% | Digital 100% | $163K | -73% |
| 2022 | Q4 | 2022 | $82K | 11 | ZUBELDIA DEREK LEE MR 96% | Digital 100% | $245K | -15% |
| 2023 | Q1 | 2024 | $2K | 4 | SCOTT, TIMOTHY E. 100% | Digital 100% | $2K | -92% |
| 2023 | Q3 | 2024 | $800 | 1 | SAVING THE SECOND 100% | Digital 100% | $3K | -88% |
| 2023 | Q4 | 2024 | $18K | 1 | SMITH, TIM 100% | Digital 100% | $21K | +74% |
| 2024 | Q1 | 2024 | $38K | 4 | SMITH, TIM 62% | Digital 100% | $59K | +34% |
| 2024 | Q2 | 2024 | $28K | 1 | SMITH, TIM 100% | Digital 100% | $87K | -8% |
Stations this firm's clients buy from
Stations this firm's clients buy from top 1 · $6,541 · Louisville, KY dominant market
Broadcast stations that committees who pay PROSPER GROUP also pay directly on their Schedule B filings. We can't prove PROSPER GROUP routed money to these stations, but the concentration signal reveals the market network this firm's clients spend on.
| Station | Market | Network | Total client spend | Buys | Activity window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAVE | Louisville, KY | NBC | $6,541 | 1 | Oct 2022 |
Revenue by service category
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
No category revenue in this window.
| Category | Total spend | Txns | Avg check | % of total | Top buyer · share | Last paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital | $1,134,867 | 144 | $8K | 100.0% | TOM REED PAC 28% | 2y ago |
Client retention
Sticky-relationship signal: how many clients keep coming back across cycles vs one-time buyers.
| Client | Cycles | All-time spend | Txns | First paid | Last paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRADLEY STORMY D | 3 | $16,242 | 3 | 2021-12-31 | 2024-02-15 |
Geographic concentration
Where this vendor's clients are based — federal committees by state, plus implicit jurisdiction for CA and TX state filers.
| State | Total spend | % of revenue | Clients | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TX | $500,945 | 43.7% | 9 | |
| NY | $326,426 | 28.5% | 1 | |
| IN | $71,135 | 6.2% | 2 | |
| CA | $65,312 | 5.7% | 2 | |
| OK | $63,328 | 5.5% | 1 | |
| CO | $32,322 | 2.8% | 1 | |
| TN | $29,114 | 2.5% | 1 | |
| SC | $19,770 | 1.7% | 1 | |
| GA | $17,107 | 1.5% | 1 | |
| DC | $10,000 | 0.9% | 1 | |
| NH | $7,500 | 0.7% | 1 | |
| VA | $3,500 | 0.3% | 1 |
Notable disbursements
5 largest all-time · 5 largest in the current cycle · 5 most recent. Each row earns its place.
| Reason | Date | Filer | Category | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Largest all-time | 2014-01-27 | TEXANS FOR DAN BRANCH | Digital | Campaign Consulting Services | $93,333 |
| Largest all-time | 2020-08-31 | TOM REED PAC | Digital | DIGITAL ADVERTISING | $78,421 |
| Largest all-time | 2020-10-15 | TOM REED PAC | Digital | DIGITAL ADVERTISING | $75,724 |
| Largest all-time | 2014-02-10 | TEXANS FOR DAN BRANCH | Digital | Campaign Advertising Expense | $69,642 |
| Largest all-time | 2014-02-25 | TEXANS FOR DAN BRANCH | Digital | Campaign Advertising Services | $68,333 |
| Largest this cycle | 2024-04-09 | SMITH, TIM | Digital | OTT AD BUY | $28,000 |
| Largest this cycle | 2023-12-12 | SMITH, TIM | Digital | DIGITAL ADVERTISING | $17,975 |
| Largest this cycle | 2024-03-15 | SMITH, TIM | Digital | DIGITAL ADVERTISING | $17,800 |
| Largest this cycle | 2024-02-15 | BRADLEY STORMY D | Digital | Digital Ads | $14,487 |
| Largest this cycle | 2024-02-20 | SMITH, TIM | Digital | DIGITAL ADVERTISING | $5,846 |
| Recent | 2024-02-09 | SMITH, TIM | Digital | EMAIL SERVICES | $150 |