PilotX
PilotX is a political services vendor. In the 2025-2026 cycle PilotX was paid $77K across 13 client committees.
Part I Identity
Stable facts about this entity. These figures do not change as you adjust the timeframe in Part II.
- Activity span ALL TIME
- Feb 10, 2020 → Apr 27, 2026
- spans 6.2 years
- Disbursements ALL TIME
- 17
- Schedule B rows
- Client committees ALL TIME
- 13
- distinct payers
Part II Activity in selected window
One timeframe control governs all three panels below. Change it once and the trajectory, top buyers, and party breakdown all update together.
Spend trajectory
Monthly spend to this vendor over the last 12 months.
Top buyers
Two views of the same data — diagram and table share the time-window control and the same top-buyers slice. Click "View all buyers in research" to drill in with the matching date range.
No buyer activity in this window.
Top buyers last 3 months · top 1
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| MENJIVAR FOR SENATE 2026 1456738 |
$596 | 1 |
Top buyers last 6 months · top 2
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| BECKMAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2026; ELI 1479950 |
$12,052 | 1 |
| MENJIVAR FOR SENATE 2026 1456738 |
$596 | 1 |
Top buyers last 12 months · top 2
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| BECKMAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2026; ELI 1479950 |
$12,052 | 1 |
| MENJIVAR FOR SENATE 2026 1456738 |
$596 | 1 |
Top buyers last 18 months · top 2
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| BECKMAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2026; ELI 1479950 |
$12,052 | 1 |
| MENJIVAR FOR SENATE 2026 1456738 |
$596 | 1 |
Top buyers last 24 months · top 4
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| BECKMAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2026; ELI 1479950 |
$12,052 | 1 |
| PROTECTING SACRAMENTO, A COALITION OF SACRAMENTO FIREFIGHTERS, POLICE OFFICERS AND DEPUTY SHERIFFS - YES ON L 1371425 |
$7,552 | 2 |
| WIENER FOR STATE SENATE 2024; RE-ELECT SCOTT 1434666 |
$3,337 | 1 |
| MENJIVAR FOR SENATE 2026 1456738 |
$596 | 1 |
By party
| Party | Amount | % |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic | $0 | 0.00% |
| Republican | $0 | 0.00% |
| Non-partisan | $76,784 | 100.00% |
Part III Reference tables
Full all-time and cycle-to-date data.
Cycle-over-cycle trajectory
current cycle earlier election cycle off-cycle year quarterly · 5 years
| Year | Q | Cycle | Total | Txns | Top buyer · share | Top category · share | Cum. (cycle) | YoY % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Q1 | 2020 | $2K | 1 | SINGH FOR JUDGE 2020; KULVI… 100% | Media 100% | $2K | — |
| 2020 | Q4 | 2020 | $21K | 2 | CALIFORNIANS FOR PUBLIC SAF… 100% | Digital 100% | $23K | — |
| 2021 | Q4 | 2020 | $661 | 1 | MAHMOOD FOR ASSEMBLY 2022; … 100% | Digital 100% | $24K | — |
| 2022 | Q2 | 2022 | $16K | 3 | GUERRA, ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 1… 61% | Other / Unclassified 100% | $16K | — |
| 2022 | Q4 | 2022 | $360 | 1 | CALIFORNIA APARTMENT ASSOCI… 100% | Other / Unclassified 100% | $16K | -98% |
| 2024 | Q1 | 2024 | $11K | 3 | CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIA… 85% | Digital 100% | $11K | — |
| 2024 | Q2 | 2024 | $2K | 1 | 960450 100% | Digital 100% | $13K | -87% |
| 2024 | Q3 | 2024 | $3K | 1 | WIENER FOR STATE SENATE 202… 100% | Media 100% | $17K | — |
| 2024 | Q4 | 2024 | $8K | 2 | PROTECTING SACRAMENTO, A CO… 100% | Digital 100% | $24K | +1996% |
| 2026 | Q2 | 2026 | $13K | 2 | BECKMAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2026; … 95% | Media 95% | $13K | +530% |
Revenue by service category
No category revenue in this window.
| Category | Total spend | Txns | Avg check | % of total | Top buyer · share | Last paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital | $43,125 | 10 | $4K | 56.2% | CALIFORNIANS FOR PUBLIC SAF… 49% | 2mo ago |
| Media | $17,256 | 3 | $6K | 22.5% | BECKMAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2026; … 70% | 3mo ago |
| Other / Unclassified | $16,403 | 4 | $4K | 21.4% | GUERRA, ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 1… 60% | 3y ago |
Client retention
Sticky-relationship signal: how many clients keep coming back across cycles vs one-time buyers.
Geographic concentration
Where this vendor's clients are based — federal committees by state, plus implicit jurisdiction for CA and TX state filers.
| State | Total spend | % of revenue | Clients | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | $76,784 | 100.0% | 13 |
Notable disbursements
5 largest all-time · 5 largest in the current cycle · 5 most recent. Each row earns its place.
| Reason | Date | Filer | Category | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Largest all-time | 2020-10-09 | CALIFORNIANS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND REHABILITATION | Digital | Online Ads | $18,972 |
| Largest all-time | 2026-04-20 | BECKMAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2026; ELI | Media | TV and online ads | $12,052 |
| Largest all-time | 2022-05-23 | GUERRA, ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 10 2022; SACRAMENTO VALLEY FOR ERIC | Other / Unclassified | — | $9,808 |
| Largest all-time | 2024-02-20 | CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE COMMITTEE FOR 2010 | Digital | Digital Ads | $7,213 |
| Largest all-time | 2024-11-04 | PROTECTING SACRAMENTO, A COALITION OF SACRAMENTO FIREFIGHTERS, POLICE OFFICERS AND DEPUTY SHERIFFS - YES ON L | Digital | Digital Advertising Exchange | $4,600 |
| Largest this cycle | 2026-04-27 | MENJIVAR FOR SENATE 2026 | Digital | Television, online, and digital advertising | $596 |
| Recent | 2024-09-15 | WIENER FOR STATE SENATE 2024; RE-ELECT SCOTT | Media | Political advertising/Media placements | $3,337 |
| Recent | 2024-10-19 | PROTECTING SACRAMENTO, A COALITION OF SACRAMENTO FIREFIGHTERS, POLICE OFFICERS AND DEPUTY SHERIFFS - YES ON L | Digital | Digital Advertising Exchange | $2,952 |