Merrimack Services

$3.27M 2025-2026 cycle

Merrimack Services is a political services vendor. In the 2025-2026 cycle Merrimack Services was paid $3.27M across 1 client committees, of which $225K flowed through Independent Expenditures rather than direct committee payments.

● Recent

Part I Identity

Stable facts about this entity. These figures do not change as you adjust the timeframe in Part II.

Source split

$3.27M = $3.05M (Schedule B) + $225K (Independent Expenditures)
Schedule B
direct committee payments
$3,049,050 6 rows 93.1%
Independent Expenditures
money this entity spent supporting candidates, NOT a committee paying them
$225,234 6 rows 6.9%
Activity span ALL TIME
Apr 8, 2026 → Aug 13, 2026
spans 4 months
Disbursements ALL TIME
6
Schedule B + IE rows
Client committees ALL TIME
1
distinct payers

Part II Activity in selected window

One timeframe control governs all three panels below. Change it once and the trajectory, top buyers, and party breakdown all update together.

Spend trajectory

Monthly spend to this vendor over the last 12 months.

Jul 2025 Jun 2026
$2.81M across 12 months
#

Top buyers

Two views of the same data — diagram and table share the time-window control and the same top-buyers slice. Click "View all buyers in research" to drill in with the matching date range.

VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE

Top buyers last 1 months · top 1

PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $52K — · 3 txns MS Merrimack Services
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
Filer Total spend Disbursements
PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT
C00580068
$51,761
IE $51,761
3
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE

Top buyers last 3 months · top 1

PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $1.18M — · 6 txns MS Merrimack Services
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
Filer Total spend Disbursements
PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT
C00580068
$1,183,517
IE $87,550 · SB $1,095,968
6
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE

Top buyers last 6 months · top 1

PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $3.03M — · 12 txns MS Merrimack Services
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
Filer Total spend Disbursements
PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT
C00580068
$3,034,764
IE $225,234 · SB $2,809,530
12
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE

Top buyers last 12 months · top 1

PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $3.03M — · 12 txns MS Merrimack Services
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
Filer Total spend Disbursements
PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT
C00580068
$3,034,764
IE $225,234 · SB $2,809,530
12
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE

Top buyers last 18 months · top 1

PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $3.03M — · 12 txns MS Merrimack Services
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
Filer Total spend Disbursements
PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT
C00580068
$3,034,764
IE $225,234 · SB $2,809,530
12
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE

Top buyers last 24 months · top 1

PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $3.03M — · 12 txns MS Merrimack Services
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
Filer Total spend Disbursements
PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT
C00580068
$3,034,764
IE $225,234 · SB $2,809,530
12

By party

Revenue by party

100% D
D · 100%
R · 0%
PartyAmount%
Democratic $3,274,284 100.00%
Republican $0 0.00%
Non-partisan $0 0.00%

Part III Reference tables

Full all-time and cycle-to-date data.

#
#

Money flow through this vendor

Where their ad buys point

IE payers (left) → races the buys targeted (right) · independent-expenditure filings only
Merrimack Services PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $52K Roy Cooper (support) $24K Don Davis (support) $18K Jamie Ager (support) $10K Total in: $52K Total out: $52K
Merrimack Services PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $88K Samuel Kelley Forstag (supp… $36K Roy Cooper (support) $24K Don Davis (support) $18K Jamie Ager (support) $10K Total in: $88K Total out: $88K
Merrimack Services PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $225K Samuel Kelley Forstag (supp… $173K Roy Cooper (support) $24K Don Davis (support) $18K Jamie Ager (support) $10K Total in: $225K Total out: $225K
Merrimack Services PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $225K Samuel Kelley Forstag (supp… $173K Roy Cooper (support) $24K Don Davis (support) $18K Jamie Ager (support) $10K Total in: $225K Total out: $225K
Merrimack Services PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $225K Samuel Kelley Forstag (supp… $173K Roy Cooper (support) $24K Don Davis (support) $18K Jamie Ager (support) $10K Total in: $225K Total out: $225K
Merrimack Services PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT $225K Samuel Kelley Forstag (supp… $173K Roy Cooper (support) $24K Don Davis (support) $18K Jamie Ager (support) $10K Total in: $225K Total out: $225K
#

Cycle-over-cycle trajectory

2026 Q2 2026 (2026 cycle): $3.05M Q2 $3.05M

current cycle earlier election cycle off-cycle year quarterly · 1 year

Per-quarter totals
Year Q Cycle Total Txns Top buyer · share Top category · share Cum. (cycle) YoY %
2026 Q2 2026 $3.05M 5 PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT 100% $3.05M
#

Revenue by service category

No category revenue in this window.

No category revenue in this window.

No category revenue in this window.

No category revenue in this window.

No category revenue in this window.

No category revenue in this window.

Per-category breakdown · cycle-to-date
Category Total spend Txns Avg check % of total Top buyer · share Last paid
#

Client retention

Sticky-relationship signal: how many clients keep coming back across cycles vs one-time buyers.

0
Anchor clients 3+ cycles
$0 · 0% of revenue
0
Repeat clients 2 cycles
$0 · 0% of revenue
1
One-time clients 1 cycle
$3,049,050 · 100% of revenue
#

Geographic concentration

Where this vendor's clients are based — federal committees by state, plus implicit jurisdiction for CA and TX state filers.

State   Total spend % of revenue Clients
IL
$3,049,050 100.0% 1
#

Notable disbursements

5 largest all-time · 5 largest in the current cycle · 5 most recent. Each row earns its place.

Reason Date Filer Category Purpose Amount
Largest all-time 2026-05-18 PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT FIELD ORGANIZING $1,335,488
Largest all-time 2026-06-02 PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT FIELD ORGANIZING $1,335,488
Largest all-time 2026-04-08 PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT FIELD ORGANIZING $189,037
Largest all-time 2026-04-30 PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT FIELD ORGANIZING $94,519
Largest all-time 2026-05-19 PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT FIELD ORGANIZING $94,519
See full disbursement table →