Challenger PG
$393K
2025-2026 cycle
Challenger PG is a political services vendor. In the 2025-2026 cycle Challenger PG was paid $393K across 7 client committees, of which $125K flowed through Independent Expenditures rather than direct committee payments.
Part I Identity
Stable facts about this entity. These figures do not change as you adjust the timeframe in Part II.
Source split
$393K
=
$268K
(Schedule B)
+
$125K
(Independent Expenditures)
| Schedule B direct committee payments |
$268,324 | 14 rows | 68.2% |
| Independent Expenditures money this entity spent supporting candidates, NOT a committee paying them |
$125,000 | 2 rows | 31.8% |
- Activity span ALL TIME
- Nov 7, 2025 → Jul 31, 2026
- spans 9 months
- Disbursements ALL TIME
- 14
- Schedule B + IE rows
- Client committees ALL TIME
- 7
- distinct payers
Part II Activity in selected window
One timeframe control governs all three panels below. Change it once and the trajectory, top buyers, and party breakdown all update together.
Spend trajectory
Monthly spend to this vendor over the last 12 months.
Aug 2025
Jul 2026
$268K
across 12 months
Top buyers
Two views of the same data — diagram and table share the time-window control and the same top-buyers slice. Click "View all buyers in research" to drill in with the matching date range.
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE
Top buyers last 1 months · top 2
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC C00606962 |
$125,000 IE $125,000 |
2 |
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$59,824 | 1 |
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE
Top buyers last 3 months · top 3
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$224,824 | 4 |
| WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC C00606962 |
$125,000 IE $125,000 |
2 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$10,000 | 1 |
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE
Top buyers last 6 months · top 4
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$224,824 | 4 |
| WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC C00606962 |
$125,000 IE $125,000 |
2 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$15,000 | 2 |
| LEADERS WE DESERVE C00843110 |
$12,000 | 1 |
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE
Top buyers last 12 months · top 8
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$224,824 | 4 |
| WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC C00606962 |
$125,000 IE $125,000 |
2 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$15,000 | 2 |
| LEADERS WE DESERVE C00843110 |
$12,000 | 1 |
| BELL JR CECIL I HONORABLE 00067547 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| DANIEL HUNT FOR TEXAS 00089893 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| HALL III ROBERT L HONORABLE BOB 00067980 |
$4,000 | 2 |
| JOHN BROWNING FOR TEXAS 00090054 |
$2,500 | 1 |
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE
Top buyers last 18 months · top 8
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$224,824 | 4 |
| WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC C00606962 |
$125,000 IE $125,000 |
2 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$15,000 | 2 |
| LEADERS WE DESERVE C00843110 |
$12,000 | 1 |
| BELL JR CECIL I HONORABLE 00067547 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| DANIEL HUNT FOR TEXAS 00089893 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| HALL III ROBERT L HONORABLE BOB 00067980 |
$4,000 | 2 |
| JOHN BROWNING FOR TEXAS 00090054 |
$2,500 | 1 |
VIEW 1 DIAGRAM DECORATIVE
Top buyers last 24 months · top 8
VIEW 2 TABLE EXPORTABLE
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$224,824 | 4 |
| WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC C00606962 |
$125,000 IE $125,000 |
2 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$15,000 | 2 |
| LEADERS WE DESERVE C00843110 |
$12,000 | 1 |
| BELL JR CECIL I HONORABLE 00067547 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| DANIEL HUNT FOR TEXAS 00089893 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| HALL III ROBERT L HONORABLE BOB 00067980 |
$4,000 | 2 |
| JOHN BROWNING FOR TEXAS 00090054 |
$2,500 | 1 |
By party
Revenue by party
D · 100%
R · 0%
| Party | Amount | % |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic | $17,590 | 4.47% |
| Republican | $0 | 0.00% |
| Non-partisan | $375,734 | 95.53% |
Part III Reference tables
Full all-time and cycle-to-date data.
Money flow through this vendor
Where their ad buys point
IE payers (left) → races the buys targeted (right) · independent-expenditure filings onlyCycle-over-cycle trajectory
current cycle earlier election cycle off-cycle year quarterly · 2 years
Per-quarter totals
| Year | Q | Cycle | Total | Txns | Top buyer · share | Top category · share | Cum. (cycle) | YoY % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Q4 | 2024 | $7K | 3 | HALL III ROBERT L HONORABLE… 62% | Strategy & Research 100% | $7K | — |
| 2026 | Q1 | 2026 | $22K | 5 | LEADERS WE DESERVE 55% | Strategy & Research 100% | $22K | — |
| 2026 | Q2 | 2026 | $180K | 5 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES… 92% | Media 92% | $202K | — |
| 2026 | Q3 | 2026 | $60K | 1 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES… 100% | Media 100% | $262K | — |
Revenue by service category
Per-category breakdown · cycle-to-date
| Category | Total spend | Txns | Avg check | % of total | Top buyer · share | Last paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Media | $224,824 | 4 | $56K | 87.0% | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES… 100% | 2w ago |
| Strategy & Research | $33,500 | 9 | $4K | 13.0% | LEADERS WE DESERVE 36% | 4mo ago |
Client retention
Sticky-relationship signal: how many clients keep coming back across cycles vs one-time buyers.
0
Anchor clients 3+ cycles
$0 · 0% of revenue
1
Repeat clients 2 cycles
$5,000 · 2% of revenue
6
One-time clients 1 cycle
$263,324 · 98% of revenue
Geographic concentration
Where this vendor's clients are based — federal committees by state, plus implicit jurisdiction for CA and TX state filers.
| State | Total spend | % of revenue | Clients | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | $224,824 | 83.8% | 1 | |
| TX | $31,500 | 11.7% | 5 | |
| DC | $12,000 | 4.5% | 1 |
Notable disbursements
5 largest all-time · 5 largest in the current cycle · 5 most recent. Each row earns its place.
| Reason | Date | Filer | Category | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Largest all-time | 2026-05-20 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY | Media | Digital Ads, Jane Kim For Insurance Commissioner, Support | $60,000 |
| Largest all-time | 2026-07-31 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY | Media | Digital Ads, Jane Kim For Insurance Commissioner, Support | $59,824 |
| Largest all-time | 2026-05-20 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY | Media | Digital Ads, Jane Kim For Insurance Commissioner, Support | $55,000 |
| Largest all-time | 2026-05-20 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY | Media | Digital Ads, Jane Kim For Insurance Commissioner, Support | $50,000 |
| Largest all-time | 2026-03-26 | LEADERS WE DESERVE | Strategy & Research | MEDIA CONSULTING | $12,000 |
| Recent | 2026-06-03 | TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY | — | RESEARCH CONSULTING | $10,000 |