Challenger PG
Challenger PG is a political services vendor. In the 2025-2026 cycle Challenger PG was paid $199K across 7 client committees.
Part I Identity
Stable facts about this entity. These figures do not change as you adjust the timeframe in Part II.
- Activity span ALL TIME
- Nov 7, 2025 → May 20, 2026
- spans 6 months
- Disbursements ALL TIME
- 12
- Schedule B rows
- Client committees ALL TIME
- 7
- distinct payers
Part II Activity in selected window
One timeframe control governs all three panels below. Change it once and the trajectory, top buyers, and party breakdown all update together.
Spend trajectory
Monthly spend to this vendor over the last 12 months.
Top buyers
Two views of the same data — diagram and table share the time-window control and the same top-buyers slice. Click "View all buyers in research" to drill in with the matching date range.
Top buyers last 1 months · top 1
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$165,000 | 3 |
Top buyers last 3 months · top 3
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$165,000 | 3 |
| LEADERS WE DESERVE C00843110 |
$12,000 | 1 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$5,000 | 1 |
Top buyers last 6 months · top 6
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$165,000 | 3 |
| LEADERS WE DESERVE C00843110 |
$12,000 | 1 |
| BELL JR CECIL I HONORABLE 00067547 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$5,000 | 1 |
| DANIEL HUNT FOR TEXAS 00089893 |
$2,500 | 1 |
| JOHN BROWNING FOR TEXAS 00090054 |
$2,500 | 1 |
Top buyers last 12 months · top 7
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$165,000 | 3 |
| LEADERS WE DESERVE C00843110 |
$12,000 | 1 |
| BELL JR CECIL I HONORABLE 00067547 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$5,000 | 1 |
| DANIEL HUNT FOR TEXAS 00089893 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| HALL III ROBERT L HONORABLE BOB 00067980 |
$4,000 | 2 |
| JOHN BROWNING FOR TEXAS 00090054 |
$2,500 | 1 |
Top buyers last 18 months · top 7
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$165,000 | 3 |
| LEADERS WE DESERVE C00843110 |
$12,000 | 1 |
| BELL JR CECIL I HONORABLE 00067547 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$5,000 | 1 |
| DANIEL HUNT FOR TEXAS 00089893 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| HALL III ROBERT L HONORABLE BOB 00067980 |
$4,000 | 2 |
| JOHN BROWNING FOR TEXAS 00090054 |
$2,500 | 1 |
Top buyers last 24 months · top 7
| Filer | Total spend | Disbursements |
|---|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1438874 |
$165,000 | 3 |
| LEADERS WE DESERVE C00843110 |
$12,000 | 1 |
| BELL JR CECIL I HONORABLE 00067547 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY 00089953 |
$5,000 | 1 |
| DANIEL HUNT FOR TEXAS 00089893 |
$5,000 | 2 |
| HALL III ROBERT L HONORABLE BOB 00067980 |
$4,000 | 2 |
| JOHN BROWNING FOR TEXAS 00090054 |
$2,500 | 1 |
By party
Revenue by party
| Party | Amount | % |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic | $12,000 | 6.05% |
| Republican | $0 | 0.00% |
| Non-partisan | $186,500 | 93.95% |
Part III Reference tables
Full all-time and cycle-to-date data.
Cycle-over-cycle trajectory
current cycle earlier election cycle off-cycle year quarterly · 2 years
| Year | Q | Cycle | Total | Txns | Top buyer · share | Top category · share | Cum. (cycle) | YoY % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Q4 | 2024 | $7K | 3 | HALL III ROBERT L HONORABLE… 62% | Strategy & Research 100% | $7K | — |
| 2026 | Q1 | 2026 | $22K | 5 | LEADERS WE DESERVE 55% | Strategy & Research 100% | $22K | — |
| 2026 | Q2 | 2026 | $170K | 4 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES… 97% | Media 97% | $192K | — |
Revenue by service category
| Category | Total spend | Txns | Avg check | % of total | Top buyer · share | Last paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Media | $165,000 | 3 | $55K | 83.1% | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES… 100% | 3w ago |
| Strategy & Research | $33,500 | 9 | $4K | 16.9% | LEADERS WE DESERVE 36% | 2mo ago |
Client retention
Sticky-relationship signal: how many clients keep coming back across cycles vs one-time buyers.
Geographic concentration
Where this vendor's clients are based — federal committees by state, plus implicit jurisdiction for CA and TX state filers.
| State | Total spend | % of revenue | Clients | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | $165,000 | 83.1% | 1 | |
| TX | $21,500 | 10.8% | 5 | |
| DC | $12,000 | 6.0% | 1 |
Notable disbursements
5 largest all-time · 5 largest in the current cycle · 5 most recent. Each row earns its place.
| Reason | Date | Filer | Category | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Largest all-time | 2026-05-20 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY | Media | Digital Ads, Jane Kim For Insurance Commissioner, Support | $60,000 |
| Largest all-time | 2026-05-20 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY | Media | Digital Ads, Jane Kim For Insurance Commissioner, Support | $55,000 |
| Largest all-time | 2026-05-20 | CALIFORNIA WORKING FAMILIES PARTY | Media | Digital Ads, Jane Kim For Insurance Commissioner, Support | $50,000 |
| Largest all-time | 2026-03-26 | LEADERS WE DESERVE | Strategy & Research | MEDIA CONSULTING | $12,000 |
| Largest all-time | 2026-04-02 | TEXANS FOR CHIP ROY | Strategy & Research | RESEARCH CONSULTING | $5,000 |